Convert joules, kilojoules, megajoules, gigajoules, or kilowatt-hours to grams, kilograms, tonnes, kilotons, or megatons of TNT equivalent.

Conventional energy equivalent: 1 g TNT = 4,184 J exactly. This compares total energy; it does not predict blast pressure, damage or release rate.

Joules To TNT Formula

The following formula converts energy in joules to tons of TNT equivalent.

TNT(t) = J / (4.184 × 10⁹)

Variables:

  • TNT is the energy equivalent in metric tons of TNT
  • J is the energy in joules

Divide energy in joules by 4.184 × 10⁹ to get metric tonnes of TNT equivalent. The denominator is a conventional energy reference: 1 g TNT equivalent = 4,184 J exactly; 1 metric tonne TNT equivalent = 4.184 GJ. It does not predict measured explosive performance.

Joules to TNT Conversion Table (Metric Tonnes; 1 t TNT = 4.184 × 109 J)
Joules (J) TNT (metric tonnes)
5,000,0000.001
10,000,0000.002
20,000,0000.005
50,000,0000.012
100,000,0000.024
200,000,0000.048
500,000,0000.120
1,000,000,0000.239
2,000,000,0000.478
5,000,000,0001.195
10,000,000,0002.390
20,000,000,0004.780
50,000,000,00011.950
100,000,000,00023.901
200,000,000,00047.801
500,000,000,000119.503
1,000,000,000,000239.006
2,000,000,000,000478.011
5,000,000,000,0001,195.029
10,000,000,000,0002,390.057
* TNT values rounded to 3 decimals. Base relation: 1 metric tonne TNT equivalent = 4.184 × 109 J.

Real-World Energy Scale

The table below compares a wide range of approximate energy estimates. Equal TNT-equivalent energy does not imply equal release rate, physical effects or damage.

Real-World Energy Scale: Joules and TNT Equivalent
Event Energy (J) TNT Equivalent
M67 fragmentation grenade7.5 × 105179 g
1 kWh (electrical energy)3.6 × 106860 g
Average lightning bolt1 × 109239 kg
Oklahoma City bombing (1995)8.4 × 109~2 t
Halifax Explosion (1917)1.2 × 10132.9 kt
Hiroshima: Little Boy (1945)6.3 × 101315 kt
Nagasaki: Fat Man (1945)8.8 × 101321 kt
Chelyabinsk meteor (2013)1.7 × 1015400 kt
Tunguska event (1908, est.)5.0 × 101612 Mt
Castle Bravo nuclear test (1954)6.3 × 101615 Mt
Tsar Bomba (1961)2.1 × 101750 Mt
2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake (radiated seismic energy estimate)1.4 × 1017~33 Mt
Chicxulub impactor (~66 Ma)4.2 × 1023~100 million Mt
Historical values are approximate energy-scale references. The 2004 radiated-energy estimate is from Choy and Boatwright (USGS, 2007); Chicxulub is an approximate estimate described by the Lunar and Planetary Institute.

Earthquake Magnitude to TNT Equivalent

The table uses the approximate scaling relation log₁₀ E = 1.5 M + 4.8, with E in joules. Each magnitude step increases this model’s energy by approximately 31.6. These are illustrative magnitude-based estimates, not measured energies for individual earthquakes. Equal TNT-equivalent energy does not imply equal shaking or damage.

Earthquake Magnitude to Seismic Energy and TNT Equivalent (log₁₀ E = 1.5 M + 4.8)
Magnitude M (scaling example) Seismic Energy (J) TNT Equivalent Reference
1.02.0 × 1060.48 kgIllustrative energy-scale comparison
2.06.3 × 10715 kgIllustrative energy-scale comparison
3.02.0 × 109477 kgIllustrative energy-scale comparison
4.06.3 × 101015 tIllustrative energy-scale comparison
5.02.0 × 1012477 tIllustrative energy-scale comparison
6.06.3 × 101315 ktIllustrative energy-scale comparison
7.02.0 × 1015477 ktIllustrative energy-scale comparison
8.06.3 × 101615 MtIllustrative energy-scale comparison
9.02.0 × 1018477 MtIllustrative energy-scale comparison
Energies are calculated from the displayed approximate relation. Actual radiated energy and local shaking vary. TNT equivalent compares numerical energy only; it does not predict earthquake effects. 1 metric tonne TNT equivalent = 4.184 GJ.

What is TNT Equivalent?

TNT equivalent expresses energy using the conventional reference of 4,184 J per gram of TNT equivalent. The value is defined rather than a measurement of a particular explosive event; it is useful for comparing energy scales.

The conventional ton of TNT equivalent is an energy unit equal to 4.184 × 10⁹ J. This calculator uses that convention consistently; actual explosive performance is a separate matter.