Enter the weight fractions and select materials to calculate the Tg blend, target ratio, or comparison with Gordon-Taylor.
Related Calculators
- Melt Flow Rate Calculator
- Hydrogel Swelling Ratio Calculator
- Crystal Density Calculator
- Theoretical Density Calculator
- All Chemistry Calculators
Common Polymer Tg Reference Values
Values are DSC midpoint at 10ยฐC/min heating rate. DMA tan-delta peak (1 Hz) typically reads 15-25ยฐC higher for the same material. Ranges reflect molecular weight and tacticity variation.
| Polymer | Tg (ยฐC) | Tg (K) | State at 23ยฐC |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDMS (silicone rubber) | -127 | 146 | Rubbery |
| HDPE | -120 to -80 | 153-193 | Semicrystalline |
| LDPE | -110 | 163 | Semicrystalline |
| Polybutadiene (PBd) | -90 | 183 | Rubbery |
| Polyisoprene (NR) | -60 | 213 | Rubbery |
| Polypropylene (iPP) | -10 | 263 | Semicrystalline |
| Nylon 6 | 50 | 323 | Semicrystalline |
| Nylon 6,6 | 50-57 | 323-330 | Semicrystalline |
| PLA (amorphous) | 55-60 | 328-333 | Glassy |
| PET | 75-80 | 348-353 | Semicrystalline |
| PVC (rigid) | 80-87 | 353-360 | Glassy |
| Polystyrene (PS) | 95-105 | 368-378 | Glassy |
| PMMA (atactic) | 100-120 | 373-393 | Glassy |
| PEEK | 143 | 416 | Semicrystalline |
| Polycarbonate (PC) | 145-150 | 418-423 | Glassy |
| Polyimide (PI) | 360-410 | 633-683 | Glassy |
Blend Tg Models
Three empirical models predict blend Tg for miscible systems. All require temperatures in Kelvin for calculation.
Fox Equation (most widely used):
\frac{1}{T_g}=\frac{w_A}{T_{gA}}+\frac{w_B}{T_{gB}}Gordon-Taylor Equation (accounts for volume change on mixing via the k parameter):
T_g=\frac{w_A\,T_{gA}+k\,w_B\,T_{gB}}{w_A+k\,w_B}Linear Mixing Rule: Tg = wA x TgA + wB x TgB (in Kelvin). Equivalent to Gordon-Taylor with k = 1.
Variables:
- Tg: glass transition temperature of the blend (K)
- wA, wB: weight fractions of components A and B (wA + wB = 1)
- TgA, TgB: glass transition temperatures of pure components (K)
- k: Gordon-Taylor interaction parameter (k = DeltaAlphaA / DeltaAlphaB, ratio of thermal expansion coefficient jumps at Tg)
If a blend is immiscible, two separate Tg values appear near each component's Tg rather than a single blended value.
Gordon-Taylor k Parameter Reference
When Deltaฮฑ values are unavailable, fitted k values from literature can be used. When k is unknown and no data exists, k = 1.0 (linear mixing) is the default assumption.
| Polymer Pair | k (fitted) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PS / PMMA | 0.47-0.54 | Partially miscible; single Tg only in certain composition ranges |
| PS / PPO | 0.85-0.95 | Fully miscible across all compositions (Noryl-type blends) |
| PVC / PMMA | 0.85-0.97 | Commercially important miscible blend |
| PLA / PEG | 0.15-0.30 | Plasticized biodegradable packaging systems |
| Unknown pair | 1.0 | Conservative default; reduces to linear mixing in Kelvin |
What is Glass Transition Temperature?
The glass transition temperature is not a sharp thermodynamic phase transition. It is a kinetically controlled event: Tg shifts with measurement rate (approximately 3-5ยฐC per decade change in DSC heating rate), meaning the same material can yield different Tg values depending on test method and thermal history.
Below Tg, backbone chain segments lack sufficient thermal energy to overcome rotational energy barriers, locking the material into a rigid, glassy state with high modulus and low creep. Above Tg, cooperative segmental motion activates, modulus drops by 3-4 orders of magnitude, and the material enters a viscoelastic (rubbery) state. This transition governs the practical upper use temperature of amorphous and semi-crystalline engineering plastics.
A useful structural heuristic: Tg/Tm (both in Kelvin) falls between 0.5 and 0.67 for most synthetic polymers. Symmetric backbone repeat units trend toward 0.5; asymmetric or rigid-chain architectures trend toward 0.67. This two-thirds approximation holds broadly across hundreds of polymers and can serve as a rough sanity check when a Tg is reported without a Tm reference.
Factors That Shift Tg
| Factor | Effect on Tg | Quantitative Example |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight | Increases asymptotically (Flory-Fox: Tg = Tg,inf - K/Mn) | PS: Tg rises ~40ยฐC from Mn 1,000 to 100,000 g/mol |
| Plasticizer content | Lowers Tg | 10 wt% water in Nylon 6,6 depresses Tg by 15-20ยฐC |
| Crosslink density | Raises Tg | Epoxy Tg increases with amine hardener stoichiometry |
| Backbone stiffness | Stiffer backbone raises Tg | Tg order: polyimide (~400ยฐC) > PC (147ยฐC) > PS (100ยฐC) |
| Side chain length | Longer flexible side chains lower Tg (internal plasticization) | Poly(n-hexyl methacrylate): -5ยฐC vs. PMMA: 105ยฐC |
| Tacticity | Can shift Tg 30-60ยฐC | Syndiotactic PMMA: 115-130ยฐC vs. isotactic PMMA: 45ยฐC |
| Hydrostatic pressure | Raises Tg (~0.02ยฐC/bar) | PS at 500 bar: Tg rises ~10ยฐC above atmospheric value |
| Film thickness (<50 nm) | Free surface lowers Tg; attractive substrate can raise it | PS free-standing films <30 nm: Tg suppressed up to 30ยฐC below bulk |
Tg Measurement Methods
| Method | Tg Definition | vs. DSC Midpoint | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSC (differential scanning calorimetry) | Midpoint of heat capacity step | Reference baseline | General screening, small samples, blends |
| DMA (tan delta peak, 1 Hz) | Peak of loss factor | +15 to +25ยฐC | Structure-property relationships, composites |
| DMA (E' onset) | Storage modulus drop onset | +5 to +15ยฐC | Engineering use-temperature estimation |
| TMA (thermomechanical analysis) | Slope change in linear thermal expansion | ~0 to +5ยฐC | Coatings, adhesives, thin films |
| Dilatometry | Change in specific volume slope | ~0 to +5ยฐC | Fundamental research, pressure dependence studies |
A Tg value without a stated method and heating rate carries 20-30ยฐC of inherent ambiguity. ASTM E1356 covers DSC Tg measurement; ISO 11357-2 applies to plastics specifically.
Example Calculation
Blend: 60 wt% Polymer A (TgA = 100ยฐC = 373.15 K) and 40 wt% Polymer B (TgB = 50ยฐC = 323.15 K).
Fox equation: 1/Tg = 0.60/373.15 + 0.40/323.15 = 0.001608 + 0.001238 = 0.002846 K-1, so Tg = 351.4 K = 78.3ยฐC.
Gordon-Taylor (k = 0.5): Tg = (0.60 x 373.15 + 0.5 x 0.40 x 323.15) / (0.60 + 0.5 x 0.40) = (223.89 + 64.63) / 0.80 = 360.6 K = 87.5ยฐC.
Linear mix (k = 1): Tg = 0.60 x 373.15 + 0.40 x 323.15 = 353.2 K = 80.0ยฐC.
For a truly miscible blend, all three models should agree within 5-10ยฐC. Large discrepancies signal partial immiscibility or an inappropriate k value, not a calculation error.