Enter the weight fractions and select materials to calculate the Tg blend, target ratio, or comparison with Gordon-Taylor.

Fox Equation Tg Calculator

Calculate blend glass transition temperature, solve for the required blend ratio, or compare with the Gordon-Taylor model.
Blend Tg (Fox)
Target Ratio (Fox)
Gordon-Taylor
Use the Fox equation to estimate the glass transition temperature of a binary miscible blend from component Tg values and composition.
Best for systems expected to show one effective Tg. If your blend phase-separates, the Fox estimate may not match experiment.
Solve the Fox equation for the required weight ratio when you know Tg of A, Tg of B, and a target blend Tg.
The target Tg must produce a valid composition between 0% and 100%.
Use the Gordon-Taylor model for an adjustable comparison when you want a fitted k value instead of the Fox default behavior.

Related Calculators

Common Polymer Tg Reference Values

Values are DSC midpoint at 10ยฐC/min heating rate. DMA tan-delta peak (1 Hz) typically reads 15-25ยฐC higher for the same material. Ranges reflect molecular weight and tacticity variation.

PolymerTg (ยฐC)Tg (K)State at 23ยฐC
PDMS (silicone rubber)-127146Rubbery
HDPE-120 to -80153-193Semicrystalline
LDPE-110163Semicrystalline
Polybutadiene (PBd)-90183Rubbery
Polyisoprene (NR)-60213Rubbery
Polypropylene (iPP)-10263Semicrystalline
Nylon 650323Semicrystalline
Nylon 6,650-57323-330Semicrystalline
PLA (amorphous)55-60328-333Glassy
PET75-80348-353Semicrystalline
PVC (rigid)80-87353-360Glassy
Polystyrene (PS)95-105368-378Glassy
PMMA (atactic)100-120373-393Glassy
PEEK143416Semicrystalline
Polycarbonate (PC)145-150418-423Glassy
Polyimide (PI)360-410633-683Glassy

Blend Tg Models

Three empirical models predict blend Tg for miscible systems. All require temperatures in Kelvin for calculation.

Fox Equation (most widely used):

\frac{1}{T_g}=\frac{w_A}{T_{gA}}+\frac{w_B}{T_{gB}}

Gordon-Taylor Equation (accounts for volume change on mixing via the k parameter):

T_g=\frac{w_A\,T_{gA}+k\,w_B\,T_{gB}}{w_A+k\,w_B}

Linear Mixing Rule: Tg = wA x TgA + wB x TgB (in Kelvin). Equivalent to Gordon-Taylor with k = 1.

Variables:

  • Tg: glass transition temperature of the blend (K)
  • wA, wB: weight fractions of components A and B (wA + wB = 1)
  • TgA, TgB: glass transition temperatures of pure components (K)
  • k: Gordon-Taylor interaction parameter (k = DeltaAlphaA / DeltaAlphaB, ratio of thermal expansion coefficient jumps at Tg)

If a blend is immiscible, two separate Tg values appear near each component's Tg rather than a single blended value.

Gordon-Taylor k Parameter Reference

When Deltaฮฑ values are unavailable, fitted k values from literature can be used. When k is unknown and no data exists, k = 1.0 (linear mixing) is the default assumption.

Polymer Pairk (fitted)Notes
PS / PMMA0.47-0.54Partially miscible; single Tg only in certain composition ranges
PS / PPO0.85-0.95Fully miscible across all compositions (Noryl-type blends)
PVC / PMMA0.85-0.97Commercially important miscible blend
PLA / PEG0.15-0.30Plasticized biodegradable packaging systems
Unknown pair1.0Conservative default; reduces to linear mixing in Kelvin

What is Glass Transition Temperature?

The glass transition temperature is not a sharp thermodynamic phase transition. It is a kinetically controlled event: Tg shifts with measurement rate (approximately 3-5ยฐC per decade change in DSC heating rate), meaning the same material can yield different Tg values depending on test method and thermal history.

Below Tg, backbone chain segments lack sufficient thermal energy to overcome rotational energy barriers, locking the material into a rigid, glassy state with high modulus and low creep. Above Tg, cooperative segmental motion activates, modulus drops by 3-4 orders of magnitude, and the material enters a viscoelastic (rubbery) state. This transition governs the practical upper use temperature of amorphous and semi-crystalline engineering plastics.

A useful structural heuristic: Tg/Tm (both in Kelvin) falls between 0.5 and 0.67 for most synthetic polymers. Symmetric backbone repeat units trend toward 0.5; asymmetric or rigid-chain architectures trend toward 0.67. This two-thirds approximation holds broadly across hundreds of polymers and can serve as a rough sanity check when a Tg is reported without a Tm reference.

Factors That Shift Tg

FactorEffect on TgQuantitative Example
Molecular weightIncreases asymptotically (Flory-Fox: Tg = Tg,inf - K/Mn)PS: Tg rises ~40ยฐC from Mn 1,000 to 100,000 g/mol
Plasticizer contentLowers Tg10 wt% water in Nylon 6,6 depresses Tg by 15-20ยฐC
Crosslink densityRaises TgEpoxy Tg increases with amine hardener stoichiometry
Backbone stiffnessStiffer backbone raises TgTg order: polyimide (~400ยฐC) > PC (147ยฐC) > PS (100ยฐC)
Side chain lengthLonger flexible side chains lower Tg (internal plasticization)Poly(n-hexyl methacrylate): -5ยฐC vs. PMMA: 105ยฐC
TacticityCan shift Tg 30-60ยฐCSyndiotactic PMMA: 115-130ยฐC vs. isotactic PMMA: 45ยฐC
Hydrostatic pressureRaises Tg (~0.02ยฐC/bar)PS at 500 bar: Tg rises ~10ยฐC above atmospheric value
Film thickness (<50 nm)Free surface lowers Tg; attractive substrate can raise itPS free-standing films <30 nm: Tg suppressed up to 30ยฐC below bulk

Tg Measurement Methods

MethodTg Definitionvs. DSC MidpointBest For
DSC (differential scanning calorimetry)Midpoint of heat capacity stepReference baselineGeneral screening, small samples, blends
DMA (tan delta peak, 1 Hz)Peak of loss factor+15 to +25ยฐCStructure-property relationships, composites
DMA (E' onset)Storage modulus drop onset+5 to +15ยฐCEngineering use-temperature estimation
TMA (thermomechanical analysis)Slope change in linear thermal expansion~0 to +5ยฐCCoatings, adhesives, thin films
DilatometryChange in specific volume slope~0 to +5ยฐCFundamental research, pressure dependence studies

A Tg value without a stated method and heating rate carries 20-30ยฐC of inherent ambiguity. ASTM E1356 covers DSC Tg measurement; ISO 11357-2 applies to plastics specifically.

Example Calculation

Blend: 60 wt% Polymer A (TgA = 100ยฐC = 373.15 K) and 40 wt% Polymer B (TgB = 50ยฐC = 323.15 K).

Fox equation: 1/Tg = 0.60/373.15 + 0.40/323.15 = 0.001608 + 0.001238 = 0.002846 K-1, so Tg = 351.4 K = 78.3ยฐC.

Gordon-Taylor (k = 0.5): Tg = (0.60 x 373.15 + 0.5 x 0.40 x 323.15) / (0.60 + 0.5 x 0.40) = (223.89 + 64.63) / 0.80 = 360.6 K = 87.5ยฐC.

Linear mix (k = 1): Tg = 0.60 x 373.15 + 0.40 x 323.15 = 353.2 K = 80.0ยฐC.

For a truly miscible blend, all three models should agree within 5-10ยฐC. Large discrepancies signal partial immiscibility or an inappropriate k value, not a calculation error.